Home Blog Page 510

Revealed: the cars we loved driving in 2017

0

The cars we loved driving in 2017We’ve had some great drives in 2017, and not all in the cars you might expect. For every supercar here, there’s a crossover. We’ve even nominated two pick-ups.

Each member of the Motoring Research team – Andrew Brady (AB), Bradley Lawrence (BL), Gavin Braithwaite-Smith (GBS), Peter Burgess (PB), Richard Aucock (RA) and Tim Pitt (TP) – has picked the vehicles that made us smile. Here are the finalists in full.

Hyundai i30 NThe cars we loved driving in 2017

Surely it couldn’t be that good, I mused, as I settled into the i30 N’s chunky bucket seat, surveyed its cabin and chewed on the talents of its arch-rival, the Volkswagen Golf GTI. It isn’t that good. It’s better. Way better. And if you’re surprised, you should have been where I was sitting as I did another long, glorious stretch of Lincolnshire launch-route roads. It’s a good job video guy Bradley wasn’t there, because I was speechless.

It’s my kind of hot hatch to a tee. Loads of feel through the controls, strong and tight front end, bags of bite from the limited-slip diff, meaty gearchange and steering, plus a gem of a chassis fully equipped with bespoke kinematics and clever adaptive dampers. For the money, it’s an extraordinary car that, even now, I just want to drive and drive. The mark of a good hot hatch right there. Hyundai’s nailed it. RA

Mercedes-AMG E63 SThe cars we loved driving in 2017

Meet the ultimate Jekyll-and-Hyde car. This upmarket and understated saloon offers supercar-rivalling performance and driving excitement, with a bellowing V8 soundtrack to match.

The ‘only car you’ll ever need’ cliché is a staple of motoring journalism – and applied, more often than not, to the Volkswagen Golf GTI. For me, though, the E63 S best fulfills that brief. From comfortable cruiser to Drift Mode hooligan, it’s got every base covered. TP

Volvo XC40The cars we loved driving in 2017

While some of the inclusions here are on purely emotive grounds, the Volvo XC40 is probably the most complete all-rounder I’ve driven in 2017. It looks great, while the interior is pleasingly upmarket and full of clever ideas to make the most of its small platform.

The current powertrains on offer in the XC40 are refined, if not exciting, while an upcoming hybrid version could future-proof the car. AB

Vauxhall Maloo R8 LSAThe cars we loved driving in 2017

This Aussie-built Maloo isn’t just a truck (sorry, ‘ute’). It’s also the fastest commercial vehicle on sale in the UK. A 544hp 6.2-litre supercharged V8 means 0-62mph in 4.6 seconds if you use launch control. Plus, a popping crackling soundtrack to match.

Going this fast in a truck is both addictive and hilarious. When the supercharger gets into its stride, you simply take off. Also, while it might only have two seats, the option to carry a wardrobe or a couple of sheep in the back only adds to the mighty Maloo’s appeal. BL

Lamborghini Huracan PerformanteThe cars we loved driving in 2017

I’m not a Lamborghini kind of person. In fact, I’m not really a supercar type of person. I hate the attention they get, and the majority of the time they’re simply too capable for UK roads. And that’s all true for the 640hp Lamborghini Huracan Performante.

I spent a few days with the Huracan Performante this December and, most of the time, it was all a bit awkward. Van drivers tried to race me and elderly people frowned at me. Most of the time I was in traffic wishing I had a paper bag to cover my face. But then I crept out (as much as you can creep in a car as loud as the Performante) for a late-night drive on some deserted local roads. I won’t say any more, but it’s quite possibly the best car I’ve ever driven. AB

Suzuki IgnisThe cars we loved driving in 2017

I had a feeling I would like the Suzuki Ignis, and having spent six months running one as a long-termer, I’m delighted to say my hunch was entirely justified. In a world in which carmakers are seemingly obsessed with making their cars feel more European, the Ignis is refreshingly Japanese.

I love the retro-inspired styling, which looks quite unlike anything else on the road, while some neat interior touches help mask the fact that it’s been built to a budget. It’s also good fun to drive, although its lightness and slab-sided design means you should avoid high winds, unless you fancy doing a passable impression of Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz. GBS

McLaren 720SThe cars we loved driving in 2017

I was tempted to put the Huracan Performante in my top three, but a) Andrew has already chosen it and b) the 720S is a more complete proposition. Probably the most accomplished supercar on sale, in fact. How far McLaren Automotive has come in seven short years…

The 720S is brain-bendingly fast (0-186mph in 21.8 seconds, anyone?), yet doesn’t feel intimidating to drive. Visibility is excellent, all the controls move with weighty precision and the brakes – including an active airbrake – are the best I’ve experienced. Others have criticised the lack of aural drama, but I like the fact it doesn’t sound as OTT as a Huracan. TP

Range Rover VelarThe cars we loved driving in 2017

Visually, it’s a concept car for the road, all clean surfaces and modernist appearance. The Range Rover Velar is also a nice drive, particularly in V6 diesel guise. It’s quite the step up in sophistication over a Range Rover Evoque and suitably different in emphasis from the Jaguar F-Pace it shares an architecture with. But it’s the Velar’s remarkable interior that really makes it stand out.

I did the first drive launch in Norway, and was wowed by its tactility, sleek appearance, the amazing dual-screen infotainment system and gorgeous seats. A few months passed, then I drove it again in LA, as part of assessments for the 2018 World Car Awards. The same flood of well-being came back to me. This is an incredibly feel-good car to spend time in. I loved each and every drive of it in 2017: the entire package is really rather special. RA

Nissan Skyline GT-R (R33)The cars we loved driving in 2017

Few things in 2017 could beat throwing a classic JDM car around a wet skid pan. The venue was Rockingham Motor Speedway and my chariot of choice was an R33 Nissan Skyline GT-R. After a bit of practise, I managed a full lap of the course without spinning out.

The well-used R33 had more than enough torque to break traction, helped by a welded diff and a competition drift clutch – the latter was effectively either on or off. It was a lot of fun, and not as difficult as I’d expected. BL

Skoda YetiThe cars we loved driving in 2017

Gone, but not forgotten. I had the pleasure of taking the dearly departed Skoda Yeti on a road trip to Northern Ireland, where I found that it remained relevant, some eight years after it was unveiled at the Geneva Motor Show. I was grinning from ear-to-ear as I made my way to the ferry along some of the finest roads in Wales.

The Yeti’s passing marks the demise of one of the last true characters in an increasingly bland and depressingly dull segment. I’m sure its replacement – I’ve forgotten its name – is a better car, but it’ll never recapture the magic of the Yeti. GBS

Audi RS5The cars we loved driving in 2017

I really didn’t like the old V8 RS5. There, I said it. Too highly strung, it had no torque, no subtlety and no ride quality. Others loved it far more than me. I remember how often I was photographed in it almost as much as I remember how cold it left me. So, with the usual trepidation with which you approach an Audi RS (is there a performance brand more divisive?), I picked up the keys to the new V6 turbo RS5 at Goodwood for a week’s extended test drive.

What a transformation. This is ‘good’ Audi RS. The new 5 is sophisticated, has a chassis with depth, feels precise and is cleverly effortless to drive viciously quickly. It oozes quality, with head-turning looks that perfectly distil the charmingly technocratic appeal of Audi RS. Some don’t like it because it’s not a thumping V8. I love it precisely because of this. RA

Ford Fiesta STThe cars we loved driving in 2017

Heard the one about the £60k RS Turbo, or the £91k Escort Cosworth? Retro Ford prices are bonkers, but there’s a future classic Ford that’s still very affordable: the Fiesta ST. The car pictured here was discontinued earlier in 2017 and its replacement – complete with a ‘downsized’ three-cylinder engine – is due soon. It’ll need to be off-the-scale brilliant to top this little firecracker.

Indeed, any debate about affordable fun cars since 2013 has inevitably been settled with the words ‘Fiesta ST’. This 182hp pocket rocket channels the spirit of the Peugeot 205 GTI, while rejecting its fondness for snap-oversteer. Its engine is eager, its steering sublime. And on the right road, only a select few sports cars are more fun. TP

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35The cars we loved driving in 2017

A massive truck with 35-inch off-road tyres and flared wheel arches… Yes, the 10-year-old in me had a fantastic time spending a week with the Arctic Trucks D-Max.

From splashing through fords on my commute to surprising cyclists on a green lane, the D-Max could do it all. Objectively it’s not the best thing I’ve driven this year – far from it – but I loved it. AB

McLaren 570SThe cars we loved driving in 2017

Another track day at Rockingham, this time behind the wheel of McLaren’s awesome 570S. A very knowledgeable racing instructor helped me push this 204mph supercar – and my driving ability – to the the limit.

I managed to reach a top of speed of 95mph down the main straight, before firmly stamping on the brake to throw the McLaren into the next bend. The best thing about this car is the noise; the roar of a 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 just behind your head stays with you for hours afterwards. BL

Mercedes-Benz E-Class All-TerrainThe cars we loved driving in 2017

This is my kinda car. I’ve been a fan of premium off-road estates since the days of the original Volvo V70 XC and the Audi Allroad, loving their blend of comfort, practicality and non-shouty styling. Right now, I’d select the new E-Class All-Terrain as my pick of the current crop of posh mud-plugging wagons.

It’s not cheap, but Mercedes’ ‘kitchen sink’ approach to the specification goes some way to justifying the £60k price tag, while the 3.0-litre V6 diesel makes surprisingly light work of hauling this two-tonne estate car uphill and down dale. A class act. GBS

Volkswagen PoloThe cars we loved driving in 2017

It’s still difficult to gloss over Volkswagen’s issues, particularly how buyers have been deceived by the company’s claims for great economy and emissions. Yet is it time to move on, to (mostly) forgive and forget? It does seem that the Volkswagen group is doubling its efforts to clean up its act, and as a consequence become one of cleanest car companies in Europe.

There’s no better evidence of this than the truly excellent new Polo, which hits the road early in 2018. A range of small petrol engines offer driving pleasure with impressive economy, combined with a sense of class and comfort that knocks even modern rivals into the weeds. PB

>NEXT: 2018 Subaru Impreza first drive

Advertisement

Fleets warned plug-in hybrids are not a ‘like-for-like’ diesel replacement

0

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEVThe demonisation of diesel is seeing many company car drivers dashing into plug-in hybrid alternatives – but one fleet car expert says this could worsen emissions and economy if it’s not correctly planned for.

Although on paper, plug-in hybrids can offer similar  or even better  claimed economy and CO2 emissions than diesel, the reality could be very different if, say, recharging procedures are not considered.

“Certainly,” said FleetCheck MD Peter Golding, “it must be a matter of policy that any driver issued with a plug-in hybrid should have off-road parking with charging available.” Ideally, there should be charging facilities at the office, too.

Drivers should also be trained in how to drive a plug-in hybrid. “Some drivers will use the electric motor to add to the acceleration… However, driving in this way will remove the fuel economy advantages.”

There may even be a need to constantly and closely monitor fuel consumption, to check drivers are using plug-in hybrids correctly.

Fleets that don’t do this “could find various problems arising very quickly, most notably poor fuel economy and the resulting increase in emissions.”

Because of all this, added Golding, it’s likely that most fleets will conclude that a modern Euro 6 diesel is still the best company car choice. “For higher mileage drivers especially, there is every suggestion that a Euro 6 diesel remains the most environmentally responsible solution, whatever the press, pressure groups and other are saying about its impact on air quality.”

The FleetCheck warning follows earlier findings by another fleet company that in-use plug-in hybrids were proving much less efficient than comparable diesel cars. The reason why? Drivers weren’t plugging them in…

NEXT> Plug-in hybrids emit MORE CO2 than diesels, report finds

Advertisement

McLaren Senna costs £750,000 – but is already sold out

0

2018 McLaren SennaThe McLaren Senna is described by the British sports car firm as “the ultimate road-legal track car” and is priced accordingly: £750,000. Despite this, all 500 cars have already been allocated to customers, meaning the car effectively sold out even before its dramatic launch this weekend.

Production will start from Q3 2018, and McLaren says the Senna will make its public debut at the 2018 Geneva Motor Show in March.

Derived from the McLaren 720S, the second ‘Ultimate Series’ McLaren (following 2013’s McLaren P1) is the firm’s lightest road car since the original McLaren F1; it weighs 1,198kg.

The 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 is the most powerful road-going McLaren engine, producing 800hp for a power-to-weight ratio of 668hp per tonne. Exact performance figures won’t be revealed until next year; for now, McLaren’s simply calling it “savage”.

It goes further when describing the styling, saying it visually “shocks… the first impression is of an aggressive, unforgiving machine”. Organic shapes are out, fragmented and performance-focused design is in. It’s not pretty, and that’s exactly what McLaren intended.

Buyers who, for some reason, feel they need extra visual drama can choose one of five ‘By McLaren’ colourschemes for the front aero blades, brake calipers, exposed gas door struts (covers are apparently too heavy…) and seat trim: colours include Azura Blue and McLaren Orange.

There’s only one choice of wheel though: it’s ultra-lightweight, uses a racing centre lock, and is fitted with Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R track-spec, road-legal tyres.

2018 McLaren Senna

It’s also not the most practical of road cars. It still has a passenger seat, but there’s no boot, simply a chamber behind the seats in which there’s just enough space for two helmets and race suits. Such racing focus is why McLaren’s added a button on the roof console to engage Race mode: this lowers the ride and “significantly” stiffens the suspension.

2018 McLaren Senna

It’s all been enough to get the Senna family seal of approach. “Our family is extremely proud of the naming of the new Ultimate Series McLaren Senna,” said Ayrton’s nephew, racing driver and McLaren ambassador Bruno Senna. “This is the first project that really connects with Ayrton’s racing spirit and performance.

“The McLaren Senna honours my uncle because it is so utterly dedicated to delivering a circuit experience that allows a driver to be the best they can possibly be. There is an absolute, seamless connection between car and driver and this pure engagement, these sensory cues that a driver responds to and relies upon, ensure an experience so focused and immersive that you are left in awe of the depths of excellence the McLaren Senna possesses.”

Unless you have £750,000 but your name’s not on the list, that is.

NEXT> McLaren 720S review

Advertisement

Opinion – Checking your exhaust emissions: mission impossible?

0

Exhaust emissionsI don’t know about you, but to me 2018 feels like it’s going to be a watershed year when it comes to public opinion on toxic air. In the UK, as in other parts of Europe, there is now massive pressure to bring air quality in built-up areas back to acceptable, safe and legal limits. Residents are acutely aware of the effects of vehicle emissions, thousands of column inches have been written on the topic and politicians are having to respond (not least following a High Court case that, naturally, got the attention of mainstream media). 

The result? While there’s still precious little concrete detail for the average motorist to get their head around, a series of Clean Air Zones in towns and cities across the UK are now very likely (and, depending where you live, an absolute certainty).

How we’re all going to be affected by these zones no-one (yet) knows. There are some compelling arguments that the oldest, dirtiest vehicles should be taken off the road first. But in those areas where the air is filthiest, there’s a very real prospect private drivers might face charges or restrictions when Clean Air Zones are introduced. Whether they are affected will depend on the Euro emissions standard of the vehicle they’re driving.

So here’s one of the first snags, and it’s a big one. Pretty much nobody I’ve spoken to outside the world of motoring has any idea what the Euro 4, 5, 6 standards are all about, let alone which category their car falls into. And that’s understandable – the Euro system has been quietly working away in the background for around for 25 years, ensuring that each time we upgrade our car we’re probably getting behind the wheel of something a little cleaner. How efficiently we all drive, of course, is another thing entirely…

But things are changing, and fast. Within months, thousands if not millions of drivers will start questioning which Euro standard their car meets to see if they’re affected by Clean Air Zones. And right now it is difficult to reliably check this. The current advice – including from the UK government – remains to speak to your vehicle’s manufacturer. But this isn’t good enough. It took five days for a manufacturer I spoke to to confirm that a 2015 used car I thought was going to be Euro 6 compliant was actually just Euro 5. You don’t find it on most V5C forms and it’s not routinely captured by any government department.

‘Dieselgate’

The Euro system isn’t perfect by any means. Some new cars still emit greater levels of harmful pollutants than they should, as sharply brought into focus by ‘dieselgate’. At the same time, some cars appear to perform much better than you might expect them to (mentioning no names here, but check the EQUA Index).  However, it’s the system we have, and it looks like the only means councils will use – at least to begin with – to decide who is impacted by Clean Air Zones. So let’s at least make sure everyone knows what it is.

The road to clean air doesn’t start and stop with the oldest polluters, though: we’ve all got a responsibility here. Three days a week I take my two small boys to nursery and school along some central Bristol streets that are no doubt plagued by polluted air at peak times (and interestingly, pretty quiet the rest of the time). Sadly, it’s a journey I make by car given the distinct lack of other transport options and I am all too aware that, sitting in a 2011 diesel saloon. I’m a contributor to the problem – regardless of how light my right foot is when driving. It really doesn’t sit well with me when I see mums and dads with buggies and tiny babies on the same level as most car exhausts.

I want to be able to make the right choices, I really do: for the people that live close to where I drive, for my kids, for the planet and, yes, for my wallet. I’m sure I’m not alone. As vehicle emissions is such a complicated topic for anyone to get their head around, the focus for manufacturers and government should be to make it simple for all of us. We have a long way to go, but making the all-important Euro category of our current (and future) vehicle clear would surely be a good start. Is that really too much to ask?

Advertisement

The all-hybrid new Lexus LS range will cost from £72,595

0

2018 Lexus LS 500hLexus has announced the new 2018 Lexus LS range will be sold in a four-model range with UK prices starting from £72,595. Every one will be a petrol-electric hybrid; Lexus has never sold a diesel-engined LS and certainly isn’t about to start now.

All models will be LS 500h variants, using a 3.5-litre V6 combined with two electric motors. The entry-grade is simply LS 500h, moving up through Luxury and F Sport models to the top-line Premier. And buyers will be able to option all-wheel drive on Luxury and Premier trims.

A deep breath is necessary before contemplating standard spec on even the base car. It gets 20-inch alloys, triple-LED headlights, dual-zone climate control boasting nanoe air quality control, 20-way power-adjust leather seats with both heating and ventilation, plus a 12-speaker stereo.

Luxury models boost climate control to four zones, and the system features a so-called Climate Concierge (it actually monitors the surface temperature of passengers via infra-red sensors, making micro-adjustments if it senses they’re getting too hot or cold. Wow…). The stereo is now a 23-speaker Mark Levinson QKI Reference Surround system, seats power-adjust 28 different ways, the rear chairs are both heated and cooled, while the leather is upgraded to semi-aniline trim.

F Sport is, yes, the sporty one. It’s got a unique look compared to other LS, with lower-profile tyres, spindle grille packed with L-motif elements, black brake calipers and jet black exterior detailing. There’s a three-spoke steering wheel inside and, underneath, variable ratio steering and dynamic rear steering.

The F Sport also gets a moving ring instrument set similar to those first seen in the Lexus LFA.

2018 Lexus LS 500h

And the Premier? Apparently, it fully shows off the Japanese tradition of Omotenashi, the art of hospitality. Seats have Shiatsu massage function, there’s a rear seat relaxation and entertainment package, while the rear chairs adjust in 22 different ways. Lexus also protects its presumably well-heeled occupants with the Lexus Safety System+ A, its “most sophisticated package yet of active safety and driver assistance systems”. This includes autonomous-drive functionality.

Ordering is open now, with first deliveries due early in 2018. By then, prospective owners may finally have digested the standard spec list of their looming new cars.

2018 Lexus LS prices

  • LS 500h: £72,595
  • LS 500h Luxury: £79,995
  • LS 500h Luxury AWD: £82,595
  • LS 500h F Sport: £79,995
  • LS 500h Premier: £97,995
  • LS 500h Premier AWD: £105,595
Advertisement

New Mazda MX-5 Z-Sport limited edition costs £25,595

0

2018 Mazda MX-5 Z-SportThe latest Mazda MX-5 limited edition has been announced: the Z-Sport is capped to 300 cars, each costing £25,595, with sales beginning just in time for the new ’18-plate’ registration on 1 March 2018.

New Mazda MX-5 first drive

Why is it special? Because this is the first chance Mk4 MX-5 fans have had to buy the new soft-top roadster with a contrast-colour convertible roof. The Machine Grey metallic paint is offset by a cherry red fabric roof, with black 17-inch BBS alloys added in for good measure.

Inside, there are free sand-coloured leather seats, and a set of Z-Sport floor mats and door kickplates. Rather neatly, Mazda’s sticking an individually-numbered Z-Sport plaque onto the dash of every car.

2018 Mazda MX-5 Z-Sport

All come with the higher-power 2.0-litre 160hp engine also used by the MX-5 Sport Nav the car’s derived from. This means they also all have a limited-slip differential, Bilstein dampers and a strut brace. Plus, of course, standard sat nav.

Jeremy Thomson, MD of Mazda Motors UK said: “The MX-5’s new cherry coloured roof was shown for the first time in public at the recent Tokyo Motor Show where it received a very positive reception.

“I’m delighted that we can bring it to UK MX-5 buyers as part of the exciting Z-Sport limited edition model.”

2018 Mazda MX-5 Z-Sport

And if the Z-Sport name is familiar, you’re clearly a hardcore MX-5 fan: it was first used in 2007, on the Mk3 MX-5. This was capped to 400 cars, each in Radiant Ebony Mica paint, with stone leather seats and 17-inch BBS alloys. This second-generation car follows the template closely, but is even more exclusive than 07 car.

“We’ve had a long tradition of producing distinctive limited edition MX-5s that allow customers to drive a sports car with stand-out looks and enhanced equipment,” added Thomson. “The new Z-Sport is one of the best yet.”

Advertisement

1 in 3 van owners is a white van woman

0

White van womanThe stereotypical image of the white van man driver is being challenged by a “van buying renaissance” that is seeing more women than ever choosing to run a van.

Auto Trader research has discovered women now make up 32 percent of van owners, something it attributes to the growing appeal of vans for use in occupational and leisure pursuits.

Self-employed people, such as those with small internet businesses, are buying vans in ever-greater numbers, meaning that a full 1.4 million households in Britain now own a van. But they’re not just for business use: 40 percent of owners say they use their vans for leisure activities as well as work.

They’re unlikely to have a tabloid newspaper shoved on the dashboard either: the most-read newspaper for today’s British van driver is a broadsheet. The middle classes comprise 37 percent of all UK van drivers.

Auto Trader editorial director Erin Baker said: “Van drivers have probably suffered at the hands of the ‘white van driver’ stereotype for too long. But our study shows a revival for the van community which celebrates van drivers of all backgrounds, genders and ages.

“The van has many benefits beyond couriering work equipment, and now with modern interiors, better technology and connectivity and an overall driving experience that’s becoming more comfortable, car buyers are increasingly turning to the van when it comes to considering a vehicle that meets their occupational and lifestyle needs in equal measure.”

Auto Trader says the used van market increased 4.4 percent between July and September 2017, and van advert views have rocketed by 47 percent so far this year: a whopping 10.5 million van adverts are viewed every single month.

The marketplace even reckons some owners could be using vans as a more cost-effective alternative to bigger cars or SUVs, facilitating weekend pursuits without costing a fortune.

Advertisement

These are all the cars in The Grand Tour Season 2 so far

0

Episode two starts in the tent, but it’s not long before we find Jeremy Clarkson driving through “the concrete canyons of Manhattan” in a Ford GT. It’s “the fastest, most beautiful, and most expensive car Ford has ever made,” says Clarkson. But why is Jezza in New York?

[amazon_link asins=’B073LTCS4V’ template=’ProductCarousel’ store=’motoringresea-21′ marketplace=’UK’ link_id=’8a16f427-dbf5-11e7-9190-f59cb62526c7′]

The race to Niagara Falls

Quite simply, to find out what’s quicker to Niagara Falls: the Ford GT or an airliner. Obviously, Clarkson takes the 3.5-litre twin-turbocharged 647hp GT, hoping to make some use of the 216mph top speed and 2.8 sec 0-60mph time. May, on the other hand, will be using public transport.

Hammond on crutches

May thinks he’s got this race in the bag, before Clarkson points out that he’s “got a handicap”. The camera then pans to Richard Hammond, who arrives on crutches. He’s suffering from the effects of his crash in the Rimac Concept One, much to the annoyance of ‘Mr Slowly’. Later, May points that they missed a train because Hammond doesn’t know how to slow down when it says ‘finish’ across the road. Ouch.

The race is on

There’s a feeling that we’ve been here before. A Clarkson vs. Hammond and May battle, complete with photo finish finale. Who will emerge victorious following the 420-mile race? That would be telling.

Hammond and May

It’s fair to say that Hammond and May aren’t huge fans of American public transport. Hammond is body searched at JFK airport, while the pair have to endure the indignity of flying economy class. #FirstWorldProblems

Ford GT

“I have been turned into Richard Hammond by six hours in that car,” said Clarkson, as he makes his way from the Ford GT to the finish line. This follows a claim that the GT has “literally the hardest ride of any car he has driven”. Not that he didn’t enjoy it, comparing the fast Ford to a “mad Caterham” when you put your foot down.

Mercedes-AMG GT R

Back in the UK, Jeremy Clarkson takes to the Eboladrome to test the Mercedes-AMG GT R. The ‘Beast of the Green Hell’ is powered by a 4.0-litre twin-turbocharged V8, developing a mighty 585hp. It will accelerate to 62mph in 3.6 seconds, before going on to reach a top speed of 198mph. The price: £143,260.

If you want a Porsche…

But Clarkson and the team aren’t fans, claiming that if you want something that’s like a Porsche, you should buy a Porsche. On the plus side, the GT R sets the third fastest time around the track, sitting behind the Aston Martin Vulcan and McLaren 650S.

Celebrity Face Off

In this week’s Celebrity Face Off, it’s cricket vs. baseball, as Kevin Pietersen takes on Brian Wilson. Both drivers take to the track in the Jaguar F-Type Coupe, to find out who is the fastest person who makes a living by throwing and hitting and catching small balls. Who wins? Put it this way: it’s extremely close.

Season 2, Episode 1

The Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

If you missed the first episode of The Grand Tour (where have you been?), he’s a recap of what happened when the boys went to Switzerland. The challenge was, quite simply, to find out which is best: the past, the present, or the future? Over to you, Jezza…

Supercars do battle

The Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

“We all know how that ends,” quips Jeremy Clarkson as the first challenge of the new season is introduced. Yes we do: with Hammond, in an air ambulance, after crashing. Again.

Things started out bang on form: Clarkson, the Neanderthal, was representing the past, with the 730-horsepower Lamborghini Aventador S, all 6.5-litres of snorting, gasoline-guzzling V12. In far-from-subtle bright yellow.

Destination: Switzerland

The Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

James May, the “crisp and contemporary” sophisticat of the trio, was showing off the present, with the hybrid Honda NSX. It has 581hp, from combining a 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 with three electric motors. It can both run on electric and do 0-60 mph in under 3.0 seconds.

Hammond, we know, is in the future – the all-electric Rimac Concept One. The Croatian company was founded by Mate Rimac, and Forbes described the firm as “a company that’s cooler than Tesla”. The Concept One is an all-electric supercar described as having around 1,200 hp.

The location for the challenge was Switzerland. Rather improbably, the boys’ base was a natural detox retreat.

Burning rubberThe Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

It was EV-driving Hammond who was in charge of the challenge, and he even chose the hotel, despite it not serving beer or anything tasty. What was he thinking? We can’t imagine. Hold on, what’s that in his hand…

Naturally, after driving through beautiful mountains and scuppering Hammond’s plan to keep driving in between electric chargers, the boys decided to have a race.

Clarkson was, of course, brimming with confidence, as his car was the lightest, and the noisiest, and the thirstiest. With an empty airfield to play with, Clarkson of course decided to then have a hoon. Which resulted in the destruction of one massive Lamborghini rear tyre. “The tyre pressure warning light came on,” he said. “I ignored it.”

Run to the hills

The Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

And then to the big finale – and THAT incident. Although you can’t go circuit racing in Switzerland, you can go hillclimbing. And it was only 200 miles from the hotel. “Which was fine, for some of us,” says Clarkson.

As for Hammond’s range-limited EV, well… “People don’t ride their race horses to the Grand National, do they,” he muses…

They finally got there, to “the most beautiful hillclimb event in the world”. First up, Clarkson, who discovered he couldn’t actually fit in the big Lambo with a helmet on. But who’s that over there – why, it’s Lamborghini test driver Giacomo Barri, who has curly hair and looks a bit like an early-1990s-spec Clarkson. Jezza had a plan…

May was next, sauntering up the hill with inevitably the slowest time to his name.

Burning batteries

The Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

Then, Hammond, in the Rimac – but first, a ‘pep talk’ from Clarkson and May, about how the whole of Croatia was there expecting him to set a new course record.

This was Hammond’s face just before he set off…

… and this was the result. Yes, that crash, another Hammond crash, with another air ambulance summoned for him. But did he get the fastest time before crashing after the finish line? 

Celebrity Face-Off

The Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

Celebrity Brain Crash is no more. “You all hated it,” said Clarkson. Instead, it’s a new spot, Celebrity Face-Off, where two people working in the same field go head-to-head in a Jaguar F-Type Coupe (a 300hp 2.0-litre turbo). This week – which is the fastest former talent show judge, Ricky Wilson or David ‘The Hoff’ Hasselhoff?

Kaiser Chief’s Wilson looked pretty handy on the new Celebrity Face-Off course, which is part tarmac, part gravel. The Hoff, meanwhile, was less handy. On his practice lap, he stopped just shy of the finish line, for no discernible reason. He did get better on his timed lap – you’ll have to head over to Amazon Prime to find out just how well he did.

Electric dreams

The Grand Tour Season 2 Episode 1

Oh, and that drag strip race? Yes, it was the Rimac that won, by a ludicrous margin. It’s worth tuning in just to see how much faster than the Lambo and Honda it is. The future wins this challenge: can it beat the past and the present to grab overall spoils in The Grand Tour’s first Season 2 challenge, though?

Advertisement

ASA rules that hybrids can’t be described as ‘clean cars’ in adverts

0

ASA rules that hybrids can't be described as 'clean cars' in adverts

The UK’s advertising watchdog has banned an advert for the BMW i3 – disputing claims that it’s environmentally-friendly while being available with a range-extending petrol engine.

The advert, which originally appeared as a sponsored Facebook post, featured a video with the claim: “With zero emissions, the i3 really is a clean car and helps to give back to the environment.”

One person complained about the advert, leading to an investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

BMW responded that the ad used unscripted testimonials from real customers and, although they would usually qualify a ‘zero emissions’ claim with a reference to ‘driving’, in this case the testimonial wasn’t edited.

It also said that the ‘clean car’ reference should be taken in comparison to conventional petrol cars.

The electric BMW i3 is available with a tiny two-cylinder petrol engine which acts as a ‘range extender’. It’s not intended to be used for long distance travel, but as a backup in case the car runs out of electricity.

But the ASA ruled that, because the i3 range-extender has a petrol engine, it’s wrong to describe it as zero-emissions.

It also went a stage further, concluding: “Cars which use petrol cannot be described as ‘zero emissions’ or as a ‘clean car’ and it was not clear from the ad that the claim was in relation to the electric battery model only.”

The ruling could have a knock-on effect for electric and hybrid car advertising in the future, with the ASA issuing a strong statement about what can and can’t be described as ‘clean’.

“This isn’t the first time that the ASA has prevented an electric vehicle advert talking about a car having ‘zero emissions’,” said Tom Callow, a spokesperson for electric car charging firm Chargemaster.

“These ASA rulings appear to create double standards for car advertising, where electric vehicles appear to have to reference the energy required to generate electricity required to power them, but where internal combustion engine vehicles do not have to make the same consideration for the energy required to refine and distribute fossil fuels. At least the ASA does appear to be recognising that pure electric vehicles are the cleanest vehicles you can drive, when both global and local emissions are considered.”

Last month, the ASA ruled that an in-built feature in the Peugeot 208 encouraged irresponsible driving.

>NEXT: Peugeot advert BANNED because this in-car feature is dangerous

Advertisement

Opinion: Does new car technology really make our lives easier?

0

Is new car tech useful

When car technology makes the national news, it’s rarely attached to a positive story. The release last week of footage featuring a new luxury car being stolen with ease, due to its keyless entry system, will have caused pangs of worry for those with similar cars. And although news of the ‘relay theft’ method had been raised previously, seeing it occur on video makes it much more real.

Before this came to light, paranoia as to whether the keyless system automatically locked the car when walking away was possibly the biggest security concern. Not anymore. Modern convenience features like keyless entry are meant to make life easier, but the fear of your car being stolen without criminals even needing the physical keys starts places a question mark over the benefits.

Yes, it might be useful for your car to automatically unlock as you approach – and do the same as you leave – but was a momentary ‘blip’ with a key fob causing consumers such undue hardship? Oh, and there’s also the issue of where to put the typically huge key, in a car now without a receptacle for it.

So while a traditional central-locking key might have been mildly inconvenient, at least it didn’t allow criminals to quietly remove your car from your drive. Or leave a questionable bulge in your pocket.

A touchy subject

Is new car tech useful

The widespread adoption of touchscreen multimedia systems has allowed manufacturers to cram controls for multiple systems into one place. It’s eliminated the need for countless buttons, letting designers create impressively minimalist interiors. But they cause multiple challenges for drivers.

Combine a modern vehicle featuring stiff ‘sporty’ suspension with a touchscreen system, and changing settings becomes more akin to ‘pin the tail on the donkey’ than a seamless user experience. It’s notable that although controllers like BMW’s iDrive were derided when new, they are often still the preferred solution in premium machines – offering the benefit of direct feedback between driver and car.

Voice command is mooted as a solution to fiddling with buttons or scrolling through touchscreens or media menus. And the latest systems have progressed a long way, with the ability to recognise and learn individual accents.

Yet voice commands are still far from infallible, and often add multiple steps to confirm even simple actions, making them less efficient than using steering wheel-mounted controls or dashboard buttons. It risks being a gimmick that drivers might try once, then never use again.

Conversely, our love for – and reliance on – satellite navigation may become a distracting obsession. A number of high-profile accidents, caused by drivers either paying too much attention to sat nav units, or slavishly following them into danger, demonstrates the pitfalls. That the Driving & Vehicle Standards Agency has felt the need to update the driving test to include taking direction from sat navs also illustrates the importance of the issue.

It might also show how slowly the wheels of bureaucracy turn, given that standalone sat navs, like those included in the driving test, are becoming obsolete due to smartphone-based apps. Whatever type of sat nav is used, it has arguably made visiting new destinations simpler, even if it has created other problems as a result.

Sensitivity training

Unintended consequences have also created new cars reliant on parking sensors and cameras, as modern vehicle designs create blind spots and hamper visibility. With protruding noses to meet crash-test requirements, plus pillar-box-like rear windows as a by-product of sweeping rooflines, cameras and sensors are almost mandatory for manoeuvring many new cars.

This might well be a successful case of using technology to solve a new problem. Nevertheless, it makes drivers reliant on features to undertake basic tasks that millions managed unaided for decades.

Internet of things

Tesla has been praised for the use of over-the-air software updates, meaning tweaks and changes can be made to cars without the need to visit a dealership. This has even included adding an ‘Insane mode’ to performance versions, but also other operating system tweaks such as updating maps – or even the range of adjustment on the headrests.

It again marks Tesla out as having more in common with a tech company, rather than traditional car manufacturer. Using over-the-air updates will be familiar to anyone who owns a smartphone, even if it does bring an inevitable lack of familiarity when a new operating system changes things overnight.

The practicality of fixing flaws and problems without needing to take a car to a dealership is unquestionably a benefit. However, it also opens the possibility for companies to dishonestly cover their tracks. Imagine a ‘dieselgate’ situation, where purely over-the-air software changes could have been used to make all cars compliant with legislation, and the temptation becomes apparent.

The march of new car technology is not going to stop, and the rise of autonomous abilities will make future cars ever more complicated. In itself, this doesn’t have to be a bad thing, and a self-driving destiny has the potential to make commuting and city driving substantially easier.

However, engineers, designers and marketing staff need to ensure they put making the lives of those buying cars easier and safer as priorities. Pointless gimmicks, or technology that is fatally flawed, will do little to make buyers ready to trust their car with more advanced driving tasks – including actually chauffeuring them around.

Advertisement