ASA rules that hybrids can’t be described as ‘clean cars’ in adverts

The BMW i3 range-extender uses a petrol engine as backup – and the ASA says that means it isn't clean

ASA rules that hybrids can't be described as 'clean cars' in adverts

The UK’s advertising watchdog has banned an advert for the BMW i3 – disputing claims that it’s environmentally-friendly while being available with a range-extending petrol engine.

The advert, which originally appeared as a sponsored Facebook post, featured a video with the claim: “With zero emissions, the i3 really is a clean car and helps to give back to the environment.”

One person complained about the advert, leading to an investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

BMW responded that the ad used unscripted testimonials from real customers and, although they would usually qualify a ‘zero emissions’ claim with a reference to ‘driving’, in this case the testimonial wasn’t edited.

It also said that the ‘clean car’ reference should be taken in comparison to conventional petrol cars.

The electric BMW i3 is available with a tiny two-cylinder petrol engine which acts as a ‘range extender’. It’s not intended to be used for long distance travel, but as a backup in case the car runs out of electricity.

But the ASA ruled that, because the i3 range-extender has a petrol engine, it’s wrong to describe it as zero-emissions.

It also went a stage further, concluding: “Cars which use petrol cannot be described as ‘zero emissions’ or as a ‘clean car’ and it was not clear from the ad that the claim was in relation to the electric battery model only.”

The ruling could have a knock-on effect for electric and hybrid car advertising in the future, with the ASA issuing a strong statement about what can and can’t be described as ‘clean’.

“This isn’t the first time that the ASA has prevented an electric vehicle advert talking about a car having ‘zero emissions’,” said Tom Callow, a spokesperson for electric car charging firm Chargemaster.

“These ASA rulings appear to create double standards for car advertising, where electric vehicles appear to have to reference the energy required to generate electricity required to power them, but where internal combustion engine vehicles do not have to make the same consideration for the energy required to refine and distribute fossil fuels. At least the ASA does appear to be recognising that pure electric vehicles are the cleanest vehicles you can drive, when both global and local emissions are considered.”

Last month, the ASA ruled that an in-built feature in the Peugeot 208 encouraged irresponsible driving.

>NEXT: Peugeot advert BANNED because this in-car feature is dangerous

  • Related Topics
  • BMW

Related Articles

Andrew Brady
Andrew Brady
Web editor at MR. Drives a 2005 Toyota MR2. Has a penchant for the peculiar.

3 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Find a Car Review

Latest

Last lap: Lamborghini Huracan bows out with STJ special edition

Limited to only 10 examples, the Lamborghini Huracan STJ is a final farewell to the V10-powered Italian supercar.

Gordon Murray T.50s track special wows crowds at Goodwood

Revealed at the Goodwood Members’ Meeting, editions of the T.50s hypercar will commemorate highlights from Gordon Murray’s racing career.

How to prevent car and travel sickness

We examine the causes of car sickness – including staring at your mobile phone and a lack of fresh air – and explain how you can avoid it.

Revealed: Morgan updates Plus Four sports car for 2024

After more than 70 years of evolution, the latest Morgan Plus Four delivers fresh-faced styling and an optional handling pack.